How a mandate is built, in three scenarios

Profile

A single-family office holding USD 500,000 of treasury cash that must stay liquid within 60 days.

Objective

Preserve capital first; target 8–12% net a year with a maximum drawdown of 8%.

What we would propose

A dedicated PAMM account at Saxo Bank in the office's own name, traded under a written mandate.

Fees

USD 1,000 per month (2.4% p.a. at this size) plus 25% of profit above the high-water mark, after the management fee.

Mandate

• Instruments: FX majors, gold, US and EU index CFDs
• Maximum gross exposure 3× equity, daily loss limit 1%
• Maximum drawdown 8%: account paused and reviewed
• 30 days' notice for withdrawals

Profile

An engineer who has traded FX on his own for three years with USD 5,000 and wants the systems without running them.

Objective

Systematic exposure to the NUUK systems, no management fee, ability to leave quickly.

What we would propose

Pooled MAM at Tickmill: his own account, in his name, allocated to the pool.

Fees

No management fee; 25% of profit above the high-water mark.

Mandate

• Same systems and risk limits as NUUK's own capital
• Fixed USD 300 risk per trade on GANN Live, scaled to pool size
• No management fee; 30-day lock-up, then withdraw at any time

Profile

A trading educator with 2,000 students who already recommends brokers informally.

Objective

Monetise the recommendations transparently without becoming a broker or handling client money.

What we would propose

NUUK master introducing-partner agreement: her students open accounts through NUUK's partner links; the rebate is split with her.

Fees

No fee to her or her students; income comes from the broker's rebate, disclosed in the IB disclosure.

Mandate

• Written rebate split, paid monthly with a per-client statement
• Broker onboarding and KYC guidance in Arabic and English
• Comparison material and the economic calendar she can reuse
• Disclosure to students: rebates are paid by the broker, conditions unchanged